<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>一枝云 GEO洞察</title>
  <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights.html</link>
  <description>一枝云关于 GEO、AI 可见度、企业内容和跨境 B2B 场景的方法与边界。</description>
  <language>zh-CN</language>
  <item>
    <title>AI可见度诊断，到底在看什么？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-visibility-diagnosis.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-visibility-diagnosis.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>企业有没有被提到，只是第一步。一次有用的诊断，还要看 AI 有没有说对、依据来自哪里，以及用户能不能顺利走到询盘。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>AI把公司说错了，先改官网，还是先发文章？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-wrong-company-fix-website-or-articles.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-wrong-company-fix-website-or-articles.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>先别急着用更多内容盖住错误。要先判断错话来自官网口径、外部旧信息，还是一次无法复现的回答，再决定处理顺序。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>企业的“母事实源”是什么？为什么官网口径必须先统一</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/company-mother-fact-source.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/company-mother-fact-source.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>母事实源不是一份给 AI 看的神秘文件，而是企业愿意长期负责、能够持续更新的一组官方事实页面。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>GEO能承诺什么，不能承诺什么？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/geo-delivery-boundaries.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/geo-delivery-boundaries.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>GEO服务可以把诊断、页面、内容、证据和复扫做成明确交付，但不能替任何AI平台承诺排名、推荐或询盘数量。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>中国工厂做跨境GEO，第一步不是批量写英文文章</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/cross-border-geo-not-mass-english-articles.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/cross-border-geo-not-mass-english-articles.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>海外采购需要的是可信供应商事实和顺畅询盘入口。连英文口径都没有统一时，批量文章只会放大混乱。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>什么样的企业文章，更容易被AI准确理解？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-friendly-enterprise-article-facts.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/ai-friendly-enterprise-article-facts.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>适合 AI 理解的文章，首先也应该让客户容易看懂：主题明确、主体清楚、事实具体，并能回到可靠出处。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>GEO复扫为什么必须保持同一套问题？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/geo-rescan-same-questions.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/geo-rescan-same-questions.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>前后两次提问口径不同，就很难判断变化来自企业优化，还是只是问题换了。复扫的价值首先是可比。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>没有进入AI推荐，就等于GEO没有效果吗？</title>
    <link>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/no-ai-recommendation-geo-effect.html</link>
    <guid>https://www.zeegeo.com/insights/no-ai-recommendation-geo-effect.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>推荐只是结果链路中的一层。判断 GEO 有没有变化，还要分别看品牌识别、描述准确性、引用来源和询盘路径。</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
